Skip to main content

Judge: Ex-soldier should pay fees to Burger King

JENNIFER SINCO KELLEHER
Associated Press

HONOLULU (AP) — A federal magistrate judge is recommending that a former soldier suing Burger King for swallowing needles in a sandwich pay attorneys’ fees and costs to the defendants for not showing up at a settlement conference.

Burger King had filed a motion asking for sanctions against Clark Bartholomew because he didn’t show up at last month’s conference in Honolulu. The former Army sergeant’s lawsuit says one needle pierced his tongue and another was lodged in his small intestine after biting into a Triple Stacker from a Burger King on a Hawaii base.

Bartholomew, who has retired from the Army and lives in Chantilly, Virginia, said in a declaration that he couldn’t travel to Hawaii for the conference because he recently started working as a U.S. Park Police dispatcher and couldn’t take time off. His lawyers also argued Burger King hasn’t taken negotiations seriously.

In a recommendation issued Thursday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Richard Puglisi said attorneys’ fees and costs are appropriate because Bartholomew defied a court order to attend the conference. Burger King also asked for a dismissal, but Puglisi said that would be too harsh.

The recommendation is still subject to approval by the presiding district court judge in the case.

Bartholomew’s lawyers are considering an appeal.

“This is the judge’s ruling and he’s a good judge. We disagree with him on this,” said one of his lawyers, Paul Saccoccio. “My client was back there trying to work. He’s an injured war veteran. Perhaps it was a bad decision, but he just couldn’t get here.”

The Honolulu attorney representing Miami-based Burger King Corp. declined to comment.

Puglisi directed defendants to let him know by next Friday the amounts spent related to the Sept. 10 settlement conference. The judge will then amend his recommendations with a fixed amount.

__

Follow Jennifer Sinco Kelleher at http://www.twitter.com/JenHapa .

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Analysis: The world Washington built is fraying. What comes next?

The United States is confronting a global security environment that increasingly resembles the outcome its Cold War adversaries once hoped to produce: a divided West, weakened alliances, economic exhaustion, multiple simultaneous wars and declining confidence in American leadership. That does not mean today’s crises were orchestrated according to some surviving Soviet master plan. The Soviet Union is gone, and the threats facing Washington now come from several different states with different interests. But the strategic effect is strikingly familiar. Early NATO assessments of Soviet intentions warned that Moscow sought to weaken the democratic powers, deny the West a secure European base and ultimately exhaust North America economically. Now, NATO says Russia is again trying to reconfigure the Euro-Atlantic security order through military force, sabotage, cyberattacks, coercion and disinformation. The difference is that much of the pressure now confronting the West is occurring simultaneously — and some of the damage to alliance cohesion is self-inflicted.
Read Next Story