Skip to main content

Trump’s desire for Greenland is nothing new in US history, DC professor explains

With all the rhetoric over President Donald Trump’s interest in potentially taking over Greenland, WTOP asked a local history professor about the nation’s practices and patterns in this regard.

Jasmine Noelle Yarish, a history professor at the University of the District of Columbia, said that though it has not happened in a while, the United States is known for acquiring territories either by purchase, cession, annexation or conquest.

She said the first such acquisition for the brand-new nation in 1791 was when Vermont, a previously independent nation, became the 14th U.S. state after the original 13 colonies.

“What’s really interesting about that one is that the agreement was that Vermont would not enter into the United States unless it was determined to be a completely free state, so there was never a history of enslavement,” Yarish said.

She said the largest acquisition of property was in 1803, when the United States acquired the territory of Louisiana from France for $15 million through the Louisiana Purchase. It effectually doubled the size of the United States.

Other purchases that resulted in the U.S. acquiring large amounts of land include the Alaska Purchase from Russia in 1867 and the purchase of the U.S. Virgin Islands from Denmark in 1917.

“A lot of these particular purchases … like Guam, Puerto Rico, those acquisitions were driven by a much more globalizing world,” Yarish said.

The U.S. has also acquired territories through annexation. Those include the Republic of Texas in 1845 and Hawaii in 1898.

And some were taken through occupation, such as the Philippines and Guam after the Spanish-American War. The Philippines became an independent nation in 1946.

Yarish compared the current conversation regarding Greenland to a period in 1848, when America expanded west for precious metals and minerals.

“The acquisition of what becomes California, the Gold Rush. What we’re seeing now with the question of Greenland feels closer to that,” she said.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story