Skip to main content

Data Doctors: Why holiday PC deals look different this year

Q: Based on the current state of memory chips, should I buy during the holidays or wait?

A: If you’ve been shopping for a new computer this year and felt a little sticker shock, you’re not imagining things. Prices on everyday PCs have crept upward during 2025, and it’s largely due to two parts most people never think about: memory (RAM) and storage (SSD).

Think of your computer like a kitchen. The processor is the cook, memory is the counter space, and storage is the refrigerator and pantry. You can have a talented cook, but without enough counter space or room to store ingredients, everything slows down.

The consumer squeeze

Right now, the tech industry is building massive “restaurants” in the form of artificial intelligence data centers. Those facilities use enormous amounts of memory and storage, and that demand is squeezing the supply available for regular consumer computers.

When supply tightens, prices rise — even for machines that don’t use any AI at all.

Another important shift this year is that Micron announced it is shutting down Crucial, its consumer memory business, which has long been one of the major suppliers of affordable RAM for everyday computers.

With one fewer manufacturer producing consumer-grade memory, competition goes down and pricing pressure goes up — especially in the budget and midrange categories that most home users shop in.

None of this caused a sudden overnight spike. Instead, prices have nudged upward gradually throughout the year.

A system that felt fairly priced in January may cost noticeably more now. At the budget end of the market, the definition of “entry-level” has shifted upward. What used to qualify as an affordable office PC now sits solidly in midrange territory.

So should you buy now or wait?

If you actually need a new computer for work, school or daily use, the holiday season is a reasonable time to buy. Retailers discount complete systems more aggressively than individual components, and buying a full system locks in today’s pricing before further supply constraints ripple through.

Waiting doesn’t offer a clear advantage. There’s no sign that memory or storage prices are about to drop, and with Crucial exiting the consumer RAM market and data center demand continuing to grow, many industry watchers expect pressure to continue into 2026 for both Windows and Mac computers.

Waiting may simply mean paying the same — or more — later.

Where people make mistakes during sales is grabbing the cheapest machine on the shelf without checking what’s inside. In today’s market, memory and storage matter more than flashy features.

For most users, 16 GB of memory is the new “comfortable minimum,” and a 1 TB solid-state drive provides breathing room for files, photos and updates. You don’t need a high-end processor unless you’re doing specialized work, but you do want enough memory and storage to keep the system from aging badly.

So is it too late to buy?

No — but it’s unrealistic to expect prices to return to what they were a few years ago.

If you find a holiday deal on a balanced system with solid memory and storage, it’s reasonable to buy. Just be careful, as the lowest-priced units often achieve that price by cutting corners, and those compromises may not be obvious to less tech-savvy consumers.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story