Skip to main content

Q&A: Everything you need to know about Real IDs as the deadline nears

It has been decades in the making, but the government deadline to get a Real ID is nearly here.

That deadline is Wednesday. May 7.

The regulations for the new ID have been in place since Congress passed a law back in 2005 tightening the guidelines to board airplanes. The law was first introduced in Congress after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The new IDs have a security-enhanced star in the upper right-hand corner to show they are compliant with the law.

The members of the 9/11 Commission felt having a national standard identification would, hopefully, make it harder for people to get driver’s licenses.

Since 2005, the government has issued several extensions when it comes to implementing the law, but there’s likely no chance the government will issue another extension beyond May 7 for the new IDs.

The IDs — which in many states reflect a new style of driver’s license or ID and are nationally approved — were supposed to go into effect in 2023. But many state government motor vehicle administrations, or DMVs, said they needed more time because of backlogs of paperwork to process the IDs.

Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration Administrator Chrissy Nizer talked to WTOP’s Shawn Anderson and Anne Kramer to explain what the ID does and what you need to do to be compliant before the deadline.

This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.



 

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story