Skip to main content

Why Cyber Monday scammers are more adept than they were last year

Digital technology advancements have always been a double-edged sword. As quickly as tasks become easier to accomplish online, crooks find ways to exploit the new technology.

“There are great things that artificial intelligence can do in the technology sphere,” said Stephen Miller, D.C.’s chief technology officer. “There’s also very bad things that artificial intelligence can do.”

With more than one billion websites on the internet, the D.C. government’s office of the chief technology officer said cybercriminals have ever-improving tools in attempting to separate money and data from unsuspecting victims.

Emails containing spelling errors, or those sent from non-registered email domain names, have been relatively easy to spot as scams.

“We all get text messages and phishing emails all the time that have enticing links in them,” said Miller. “What AI has done is it’s found ways to make those emails more grammatically correct and make it seem like they’re more reputable than they actually are.”

While clicking on a link may bring you to a familiar site, Miller suggests taking an extra step to verify its authenticity, by entering the domain name yourself: “If it’s Macy’s, type out Macy’s. If it’s Amazon, type out Amazon, instead of clicking on that link.”

He said to use care when a link takes you to an unfamiliar website.

“If it’s a site you’ve never heard of, do a little bit of online research,” Miller said. “With a quick Google search on that site, you may find other customers saying the deal was too good to be true.”

He added that you should stick with trusted payment methods.

“If it’s something that’s reputable, like PayPal or Apple Pay or Google Pay, that’s certainly going to be better than ‘Jim’s Credit Card Payment Service’,” said Miller. “And Apple Pay, Google Pay, and PayPal have additional security measures that are built-in, like credit cards, which have more fraud protection than debit cards.”

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story