Skip to main content

LL Flooring files for Chapter 11, with closing sales at its Woodbridge store

Richmond, Virginia-based discount flooring chain LL Flooring, formerly known as Lumber Liquidators, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and will close 94 of its existing 300 stores as part of the reorganization.

Stores closing include LL Flooring in Woodbridge, Virginia, along with locations in Edgewood and Lutherville, Maryland. Other D.C.-area stores are not affected, including locations in Chantilly, Manassas, Leesburg, Beltsville and Rockville.

The stores closing, including Woodbridge, will have going out of business sales to clear inventory before permanently closing. A list of store closings is online.

LL Flooring said it was in active negotiations with multiple bidders, and hopes to win bankruptcy court approval to sell its business within the first few weeks of its Chapter 11 proceedings.

“After comprehensive efforts to enhance our liquidity position in a challenging macro environment, a determination was made that initiating this Chapter 11 process is the best path forward for the company,” CEO Charles Tyson said in a statement.

Lumber Liquidators was founded in 1994. It changed its name to LL Flooring in 2022.

The company was subject of a 60 Minutes investigation in 2015 that said the company was selling Chinese-made laminate flooring with high levels of cancer-causing formaldehyde, which led to criminal charges filed by the U.S. government and several class-action lawsuits.

LL Flooring had $189 million in first quarter sales, down 21.7% from a year earlier. It posted a $29 million first quarter loss.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story