2026-07-15 22:10:28 Which DC-area hospitals graded poorly on preventable medical errors? – NEW WTOP Skip to main content

Which DC-area hospitals graded poorly on preventable medical errors?

Though national trends have improved, a new report says some of the D.C. region’s hospitals grade poorly when it comes to preventable medical errors, accidents, injuries and infections.

According to an assessment by the Leapfrog Group, a nonprofit watchdog organization focused on patient safety, the University of Maryland Capital Region Medical Center in Upper Marlboro and Fauquier Hospital in Warrenton, Virginia, both received “D” grades for patient safety and avoiding preventable illnesses.

In the District, Howard University Hospital received an “F.”



Leapfrog said only 1% of the nearly 3,000 hospitals examined nationally received an “F” grade, while 6% received a “D” grade.

The group said overall performance on a national level has improved over the last decade, including when it comes to reducing “never events,” meaning medical accidents that should never happen.

“Two ‘never events’ that decreased by around 25% include incidents of falls and trauma, and incidents of objects unintentionally left in a body after surgery,” according to the report.

The group said that for “five of the outcome measures that can be tracked,” improved hospital safety measures have resulted in 16,000 fewer deaths over the last decade.

On the bright side for our area, Virginia ranks among the top 10 states with the highest percentage of “A” rated hospitals. On the other hand, the District currently has no “A” rated hospitals within its border, per Leapfrog Group’s findings.

WTOP’s John Aaron contributed to this report.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story