Skip to main content

Nando’s pokes fun at anti-vaxxers in new app ads

Flame-grilled chicken chain Nando’s PERi-PERi is launching a new app, and using the occasion to poke fun at conspiratorial COVID-19 anti-vaxxers, an expression of what it calls the company’s exhaustion with customers who refuse to get vaccinated.

In a series of parody videos, online ads, posters and social media, the “Don’t be an Anti-Apper” ads poke fun at science disbelievers, fake-news proponents and other conspiracy theorists. It says the campaign has two goals: to encourage people to get vaccinated and end the COVID pandemic, and to drive traffic to the new Nando’s app.



In the videos, actors playing “real people” make conspiratorial comments about the “dangerous new app,” with such reactions as: “No one has studied the side effects of ordering directly from your phone,” “They say trust the science, but there is no science in the app,” “Could apps on a phone make a guy impotent?,” “I don’t want the Nando’s app on my phone and I sure as hell don’t want my phone implanted with 5G,” and, “I ordered Nando’s directly from my phone once, but I realized no one has studied the side effects.”

Nando’s says it feels the direct effect every day at its stores in the D.C. area and Chicago area, the only U.S. markets where it has a presence, with staff getting sick and restaurants closing temporarily because of staff shortages and illness.

“COVID is tough on everyone, of course, but the hospitality industry business has been particularly hard hit. Nando’s wants to push back,” Nando’s said in a statement.

Vaccination rates are high in the D.C. area, but the chain still runs the risk of alienating customers, or potential customers by mocking the anti-vaccination sentiment.

“We certainly hope not. That is not our intention. We think that through some good humor and some tongue-in-cheek advertising, we can encourage a conversation around the benefits of vaccination,” said Sepanta Bagherpour, Nando’s chief brand officer.

Nando’s often uses satire in advertising to take on social issues.

In 2020, to promote voter registration for the upcoming national elections, it had a campaign called “The Undemocratic Meal,” adding menu choices with horrible combinations, like mayonnaise on chocolate cake, to make the point that choice matters. It also added free voter registration cards to its menus.

In 2017, for Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration, Nando’s “Everyone is Welcome” campaign draped restaurants with signs saying “Muslims, Immigrants, Gay People all welcome.” It also included posters in the former Express commuter newspaper.

Nando’s was founded in Johannesburg, South Africa, in 1987.

“We are a brand that started at the end of the Apartheid era in South Africa. We owe it to South Africa and we owe it to ourselves to continue to continue to have an opinion and to lean into social issues,” Bagherpour said.

Nando’s has restaurants in 23 countries and its first U.S. location opened in D.C. in 2008. It now has 43 restaurants in the D.C. and Chicago areas.

Here is one of Nando’s social media videos:

[connatix_element_embed script_id=5d09415cc83d43d5b38ea49de6d1f4a9 player_id=9be9c680-c459-4acb-af21-654a2ccca384 video_id=e0b29b14-7fdd-48b0-9c43-cc286e410258]

Video courtesy of Nando’s PERi-PERi.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story