Skip to main content

DC judge refuses attempt to block COVID vaccine mandate for police

A D.C. Superior Court judge Wednesday refused to block the District’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate affecting police officers. Judge Joan Zeldon denied the request for a temporary restraining order from the Fraternal Order of Police, the Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee, the D.C. Police Union and four officers, writing that the plaintiffs’ request did not meet the court’s criteria for such orders. For instance, Zeldon wrote, police would not be “in danger of suffering irreparable harm” if a temporary restraining order were not granted. COVID-19 vaccines, Zeldon wrote, have been given to millions of people. “Plaintiffs argue that vaccine is an irreversible medical procedure with a risk of serious medical consequence, and it violates their right to bodily integrity and personal autonomy,” Zeldon wrote. “These assertions, though deeply felt by officers who are resisting vaccination, are speculative.” Under D.C.’s mandate, officers who failed to comply with it by Feb. 15 would be subject to discipline, but Zeldon pointed out that no action could be taken until a month later, March 15, and that removal of an employee would follow a series of steps, beginning with “verbal counseling.” “While this judge is sympathetic to an officer who does not want a disciplinary action that may be brought in the future on his or her record,” Zeldon wrote, “the choice of whether or not to be subject to a vaccine enforcement process is the officer’s.” In addition, such an order would not serve the public interest, the judge wrote, and D.C.’s interest in protecting the health and safety of its employees and the public from coronavirus “outweighs the potential harms plaintiffs allege they face.” An administrative challenge to the vaccine policy is now before the Public Employee Relations Board, which handles labor disputes between D.C. agencies and employees. That challenge is being handled by the Office of Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining and the mayor’s office. D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine reacted to the decision on Twitter.

WTOP has reached out to the plaintiffs’ attorneys for comment.


More Coronavirus news

Looking for more information? D.C., Maryland and Virginia are each releasing more data every day. Visit their official sites here: Virginia | Maryland | D.C.

Experts, advocates: LGBTQ+ students ‘collateral damage’ in education debates, controversy

Since Gov. Glenn Youngkin announced the 2022 Model Policies for Virginia schools that are intended to require students to use locker rooms and programs that match their assigned sex, rather than their gender identity, controversial conversations have continued to impact day-to-day educational experiences. Those policies require parental permission to change names and genders noted on school records — issues that have made some Virginia students concerned for their privacy and safety.
Read Next Story