Skip to main content

Why the DC metro area is No. 1 for Internet speeds

HighSpeedInternet.com, which tests and reviews broadband service providers, recently conducted more than 1.7 million speed tests in the 100 largest American metro areas, and the D.C. area ranked first for fastest average speed.

The average download speed in the D.C. area clocked in at 129.1 megabits per second.

The region’s status as the data center capital of North America means there are very robust fiber networks here, but aside from that, HighSpeedInternet.com says the fastest download speeds tend to be in cities on the East Coast.

“You’ll find that these areas are more tightly urbanized, and they have bigger populations that are more densely populated. That is a better return on investment for fiber companies installing infrastructure, because the technology was probably embraced earlier, and because they’ve been implemented at a larger scale,” said HighSpeedInternet.com researcher Tim Tincher.

San Francisco and Las Vegas were the only Western cities to make the top 10, at third and ninth, respectively.

The slowest average download speed among the 100 metros tested is Charleston, West Virginia, at 32.7 megabits per second. But even that is not too slow.

“The FCC defines broadband as 25 megabits per second, which is probably good for somebody who is living alone or one or two people who are at home browsing. But if you have a whole family working and streaming, that’s when you start to notice, ‘Oh, we don’t have a fast enough Internet speed,'” Tincher said.

HighSpeedInternet.com conducted its speed tests between Feb. 1 and March 16, and filtered out incomplete, duplicate and cellphone data. Below is a map of the 10 fastest and slowest average Internet speed metros:

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story