Skip to main content

Harvard expert: Concerns about COVID-19 vaccine development show safety systems work

A Harvard researcher believes the public deserves to see the kind of scrutiny that the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is getting, and that the transparency of those efforts should mean that the trials won’t compromise the credibility of vaccines.

U.S. officials are again evaluating the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine amid concerns that “outdated information” might have been included in promising results from a U.S. trial.

“We have to be transparent about it,” said Gillian SteelFisher, deputy director of the Harvard Opinion Research Program. “We have to actually put it out there.”

The AstraZeneca vaccine rollout in Europe has been challenged by reports of blood clots in a few dozen of the millions of people across Europe who had gotten the shot, and by a manufacturing mistake that researchers initially didn’t acknowledge.

The question came up as to whether those setbacks were undermining confidence in the vaccine, but SteelFisher rejected the notion, saying people should have more confidence in the process for exactly this reason.

“It doesn’t have to be undermining. I think what’s undermining is when things are said without context, they’re said repeatedly, and there’s not an understanding of the broader system in which this came to light: because we have a really robust safety check system, because we’re really making sure that it’s safe.”

“Sometimes we miss the mark on the messaging,” SteelFisher added. “If this is a false alarm, we should be glad that we have an alarm system. We’re actually doing due diligence. We’re actually making sure, that from a public heath [perspective], these vaccines don’t just go out. … We sometimes don’t say it that way. This is an expected part of the system, and we haven’t prepared people for the fact that this is the system; this is what’s going to happen.”

SteelFisher’s comments came on Tuesday, during an event by the Forum at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and The World from PRX & GBH.


More Coronavirus News

Looking for more information? D.C., Maryland and Virginia are each releasing more data every day. Visit their official sites here: Virginia | Maryland | D.C.


Md. vaccine policy ‘will be led by science’: New law decouples guidance from federal agencies

As of July 1, Maryland will determine which vaccines should be administered, severing its reliance on federal agencies, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Vax Act, signed Tuesday by Gov. Wes Moore, authorizes Maryland's health secretary to set recommendations for immunizations, screenings and preventive services. It also requires insurance companies to cover vaccines endorsed by the state.
Read Next Story