Skip to main content

Who’s ordering what the most around DC? UberEats ranks it all

D.C.-area restaurants have relied on third-party delivery companies more than ever this year because of the pandemic and on-site dining restrictions.

One of those companies, UberEats, delivers just about everywhere in the D.C. area. It became the second-largest restaurant-delivery company this year — behind DoorDash — after its acquisition of Postmates.

When WTOP asked UberEats what the top neighborhoods for deliveries are around D.C., it ranked the top five, based on number of orders in 2020. They are Northeast D.C. (it did not specify a specific neighborhood), Shaw, Adams Morgan, Arlington County’s Lyon Park (a dense residential neighborhood south of Rosslyn) and Pentagon City.

UberEats also said the busiest time for food-delivery orders in the D.C. area this year has been 5 to 8 p.m.

The company also provided its list of the area’s top five restaurant groups in no particular order but by local favorite popularity. All five are locally owned restaurants.

The top five restaurants are:

What are people ordering? Per UberEats, the top 10 foods in the region, by volume, in 2020 are:

  • Fries.
  • Honey-butter-fried chicken.
  • Burrito bowls.
  • Crispy shrimp tacos.
  • Vanilla shakes.
  • Guacamole and chips.
  • Garlic naan.
  • Pizza.
  • Bacon-egg-and-cheese bagel sandwiches.
  • Pupusas.

UberEats surveyed more than 400 restaurant owners who use its third-party delivery services across North America. According to its survey, 82% of establishments say the application has been crucial to their business during the pandemic.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story