Skip to main content

Reactions to Washington’s NFL team name change

By Rob Woodfork
Thomas Robertson

Washington’s NFL franchise officially announced Monday it will drop its controversial name after 87 years, signaling the imminent end of an era in which the franchise was labeled with a dictionary-defined racial slur. Former Washington players, activists, experts and other officials shared their reactions with WTOP. Fans and celebrities alike reacted to the news on social media. “The R word itself is a racial slur, but everything that goes with that, the Native imagery, all of those things are offensive and stereotypical, and so the greatest hope is that he [team owner Dan Snyder] chooses a name that has nothing to do with ethnicity or racial groups at all,” John Two-Hawks, a curator at nativecircle.com, told WTOP. Kevin Gover, director of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian, first wrote a letter to the NFL team about its name in 1973. For him, Monday’s announcement was welcome, but only a start.

“It’s kind of almost hard to even believe it because we’ve been in this battle for, myself personally over 25 years, and Native people in general have been at this battle for probably close to 70 years,” John Two-Hawks of nativecircle.com told WTOP. (Courtesy John Two-Hawks)
“The demand is not just to get rid of the name but to stop using Native Americans as mascots, and that applies not just to the Washington football team but to all of the professional, and even college and high school, teams that continue to use Native imagery in support of their teams,” Gover said. Former Redskins offensive lineman and member of the fabled “Hogs,” Jeff Bostic, shared opposing thoughts about the name change with WTOP. “I think everybody was so proud of that name when I was fortunate enough to play and like I said, it’s just that our society has changed from when I started in 1980 to where it is right now,” Bostic told WTOP. “Our country has become so socially correct and politically correct. I loved what Dan Snyder said seven or eight years ago, that ‘I’ll never change the name,’ but this is nothing more than business. This is monetary and that’s exactly the impetus behind Dan Snyder’s decision — money.” Gover and Two-Hawks acknowledged that corporate pressure was what likely caused Snyder to change the name, but what influenced that corporate pressure is the important thing. “We gave up a long time ago on the idea that the simple morality of the issue would lead ownership to the right decision,” Gover said. “Having said that, the strategy of the anti-mascot people for a very long time has been to damage the brand and make it less valuable.” Sports journalist Kevin Blackistone is a frequent panelist on ESPN’s “Around the Horn.” In addition, he teaches at the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland, and he also writes sports commentary for The Washington Post. Blackistone believes the team needs to make a complete break from the Native American imagery, and the names that are floating around — such as Red Tails, Red Wolves or Warriors — mimic what the team was pressured to get away from.

“The idea of red and what that means to Native people is a reminder of what you were, and that’s not a clean enough break for me,” Blackistone told WTOP’s Dave Johnson.

Blackistone said the name Red Tails, to honor the Tuskegee Airmen, seems to be a “bone that owners are throwing to Black fans to placate us and make us feel better.” He also believes that NFL games have “enough militarization,” when the military has nothing to do with this. “Tuskegee Airmen brings back segregation. Sure the Tuskegee Airmen overcame great odds, but it also reminds me of the odds they had to overcome,” Blackistone said. The National Office for Tuskegee Airmen Incorporated told Deadspin that it would be “honored” to work with the NFL franchise if it were to change the name of the organization to the Washington Red Tails. Former team play-by-play announcer Frank Herzog summed up what likely drove the decision in one word: money.

“When FedEx, Nike, Pepsi, Target, all these other retailers said, ‘That’s it. We’re not going to merchandise them anymore,’ that turned the tide as far as Mr. Snyder was concerned,” Herzog said.

Herzog believes the process has been going on for a couple of months. “The only thing that surprises me is that [Snyder’s] gone ahead and picked the name, but they might have a contest but other than that. Not surprised at all,” Herzog said.

Herzog said Snyder is going to make a fortune on merchandise, when fans buy new clothes, jerseys, hats, decals and coffee cups with the new name.

“Money. That’s what counted,” Herzog said.

Nneka Logan, a professor of communication at Virginia Tech who specializes in corporate communication and social responsibility, said that just because it was the pressure from sponsors that likely led to the name change doesn’t mean the years of advocacy from Native Americans wasn’t effective. “I think without the activism of Native Americans and other groups pressuring the Redskins to change the name that has been going on for years and years and years, without that, I don’t think you’d see corporate America stepping up and then saying, ‘Hey, you need to make this change,'” Logan said. “You need the grassroots to get the big dollar corporations to make a change. They work together,” she said. However, one thing is missing that makes Blackistone doubt that team ownership had a genuine moment of enlightenment about why a name change was necessary — an apology.

“You’ve heard none of that. That’s what makes it so disingenuous to me. So tone deaf that no one has said that,” Blackistone said.

As for what’s next, Matt Williams was involved in another marquee name change in Washington. He was the vice president of communications for the Washington Bullets when the team decided to change its name in 1995. The team didn’t play its first season as the Wizards until 1997. “The entire time you’re trying to cross all the Ts and dot the Is to make sure that the entire brand is being launched properly,” Williams said. The Washington NBA team launched a contest for public input for the new name. Even if the Washington NFL team doesn’t go that route, Williams said the team should decide on a name, commit to it and move past the old name.

“You’re not picking a GM; you’re picking a name that’s going to be representative of the entire region,” said Blackistone, who supports community involvement in choosing the name of the football team.

“You’re never going to make everyone happy and that’s the big take-away here, and that’s what I would tell the Redskins,” Williams said. Will the change have an impact on fans of Washington football long-term? Washington Post sports columnist John Feinstein told WTOP he doesn’t think so. “Your team is your team,” he said. “I don’t think they’ll change the team colors. If the team is winning people are going to go the stadium, people are going to buy the new gear. If the team is losing, then they’re going to be very unhappy but that has nothing to do with the name.” Herzog said it was time to change the team’s name. “The reality is it has to change. We’re changing as a nation. We’re changing as a people, and it’s time to make that change.”

Reactions on social media

As many reminisced over the Burgundy and Gold’s glory years, some celebrated the retirement of the offensive current name, and noticed the team’s official news release hadn’t done enough to dissociate from it.

WTOP asked listeners how they feel about the name change and what the new name should be. Many of those who responded expressed dissatisfaction with team owner Dan Snyder.

Others took a more practical approach.

Other fans on Twitter expressed sadness to see the brand go with an eye toward the future.

Though former Washington players from the team’s glory years during the 1980s-90s — most notably MVP kicker Mark Moseley and two-time Super Bowl champion receiver Gary Clark — expressed sorrow to see the name go, some players during the Snyder era were excited about a name change.

WTOP’s Abigail Constantino, Dave Johnson and Megan Cloherty contributed to this report.

Here are the important 2023 NFL offseason dates fans should know

By Ryan Wormeli
Important 2023 NFL offseason dates fans should know originally appeared on NBC Sports WashingtonThe NFL is currently in the thick of its offseason, but there are still plenty of key dates to circle before the 2023 season kicks off on September 7.Here are important offseason dates to know...2023 NFL Offseason Key DatesMarch 13-15: NFL teams are permitted to begin negotiating with prospective free agents, but no deals can be signed just yet.March 15: New league year begins at 4 p.m. Free agents are now permitted to sign contracts with clubs.March 26-29: Annual league meetings in PhoenixApril 3: Teams with new head coaches (Carolina, Denver, Houston, Indianapolis and Arizona) can begin offseason workout programsApril 17: Teams with returning head coaches can begin offseason workout programsApril 26-29: 2023 NFL Draft in Kansas City May 2: Deadline to exercise fifth-year options on first-round picks from the 2020 NFL DraftMay 5-8 or May 12-15: Teams can hold three-day rookie camps for draft picks and undrafted free agentsMay 22: First day of OTAs for select teams. Clubs are allowed to hold 10 total on-field practices, but no live contact is allowed.May 22-24: NFL spring league meetingsJune 6: Start of mandatory minicamp for select teams. Clubs are allowed to have three mandatory practices.July 17: Deadline for teams with franchise-tagged players to sign a long-term contract extension. Teams are not allowed to re-engage in negotiations with a franchise player after this date until the conclusion of the 2023 season.August 3-6: NFL kickoff weekend in Canton, OhioSeptember 7: Opening game of the 2023 NFL regular season
Read Next Story

Related News

After 1 year of ‘Washington Football,’ fans weigh in on new name

Washington Football Team rules out Warriors as new name