
The dead end for Baghdadi does not signal the end for ISIS
William Braniff, director of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism at the University of Maryland said in an interview on Oct. 23, “Groups like al-Qaida and ISIS are really better understood as movements. These are constellations of terrorist actors comprised of organizations comprised of individuals who are inspired by those organizations and they’re global.” Last year, while Baghdadi was shuttling from place to place, using women and children to shield him, according to Braniff, “the so-called Islamic State conducted attacks in 34 countries around the world.” “When you look at it, is a movement and not a singular organization in a singular geography like Iraq or Syria,” he suggests. The loss of one person, Braniff believes, even someone like Baghdadi, will not likely destroy a significant terror organization like ISIS. Dr. Hans Jakob Schindler, Senior Director of the Counter Extremism Project has a slightly different view. “Baghdadi’s main role at this point was not so much the operational control of individual attacks, including in Iraq or Syria, let alone globally, but to serve as a symbolic rallying point for the members of ISIL and the individual to which new members and groups could pledge bayat, which is a central concept for these groups that generates loyalty.”
The future of ISIS
Schindler said Baghdadi’s death poses two major challenges. “The immediate challenge is that all the loyalty oaths have been to him,” Schindler said. “Therefore, anyone or any group wishing to leave ISIL can now argue that with the death of Baghdadi, their oath of loyalty died with him. “The more long-term challenge is going to be to find a new leader that is acceptable for the global organization and frankly, this is going to take some time.” Typically, scholars and intelligence officials who follow terrorist activities think the loss of someone like Baghdadi, while an immediate blow to the organization, would later deliver more followers. But in a tweet after the news of Baghdadi’s death broke, Robin Simcox, Margaret Thatcher Fellow at the Heritage Foundation disagreed.
You’ll hear in the days to come about how killing Baghdadi just “makes him a martyr” and will “serve as a recruitment tool”. Just a reminder that this argument was bunk when it was applied to bin Laden; bunk when applied to Awlaki; and it is bunk now. https://t.co/lp1THMvnB6
— Robin Simcox (@RobinSimcox) October 27, 2019
Referring to the U.S. troop pullout in Syria, Simcox told WTOP that with or without Baghdadi, “the obvious concern at the moment is how ISIS is going to reconstitute itself after the uncertainty and turmoil we’ve seen in Syria over the past couple of weeks.” Baghdadi was very careful about exposing himself. 
