Skip to main content

DC is a top restaurant choice for people with food allergies

WASHINGTON — The District ranks No. 2 on a list of the most allergy-friendly states for dining out, even though it isn’t a state.

The list was put together by AllergyEats, a crowdsourced app used by people with food allergies to find restaurants that will meet their needs.

Delaware ranks as the most allergy-friendly state. Maine, Massachusetts and New York round out the top five.

Oklahoma, Kansas and West Virginia rank as the worst states for diners with food allergies.

The AllergyEats list is based on restaurant reviews by its users.

“While each state certainly has its share of allergy-friendly restaurants, as well as those that are not so friendly, there is a stark difference in the general level of accommodations by restaurants in the best versus the worst states on the list,” said AllergyEats CEO Paul Antico.

“The results also paint a fascinating picture about food allergy-friendliness across the various regions of our country, particularly between the Northeast versus the Western U.S.,” he said.

New England and the mid-Atlantic rank as the most allergy-friendly regions for diners. The West and Southwest rank as the worst.

“While one can only speculate as to the cause of this difference, there definitely appears to be a greater focus on advocacy, restaurant training and food-allergy restaurant laws in the Eastern U.S.,” Antico said.

AllergyEats lists more than 850,000 restaurants nationwide and includes users’ comments, web links and menus.

The 10 most allergy-friendly states (plus D.C.):

1. Delaware
2. District of Columbia
3. Maine
4. Massachusetts
5. New York
6. Vermont
7. Florida
8. Rhode Island
9. South Carolina
10. New Hampshire

And the 5 least allergy-friendly states:

1. Oklahoma
2. Kansas
3. West Virginia
4. Utah
5. Texas

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story