Skip to main content

DC law firms put in almost 1 million pro bono hours in 2017

By Jeff Clabaugh

WASHINGTON — Some of the most prominent law firms in the nation are either based in D.C. or have offices here, but it’s not always about billable hours.

D.C. lawyers performed more pro bono work in 2017 than any previous year, according to the D.C. Bar Pro Bono Initiative Report, an annual survey by the D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center.

The report tallied 916,850 hours of pro bono work at 59 D.C. law firms last year.

The D.C. Bar Pro Bono Initiative was launched in 2001 to encourage law firms to devote more time to pro bono legal services.

It sets a goal for law firms of 60 to 100 hours or 3 percent to 5 percent of billable hours for pro bono work.

“We have an incredibly strong pro bono culture in the D.C. legal community, and scores of law firms have committed significant resources to helping close the access to justice gap,” said Rebecca Troth, executive director of the D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center.

“But while the results of this year’s survey are encouraging, the need for pro bono help for individuals and families in our own community remains overwhelming,” she said.

Pro bono hours represented an average 5.1 percent of billable hours at the law firms that participated in the survey. The average pro bono hours per attorney last year was 90 hours.

Attorney participation in pro bono legal services was 80 percent in 2017, according to the survey.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

By The Associated Press
BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story