Skip to main content

DC housing market has 1.9 month supply. What does that mean?

WASHINGTON — Lack of inventory, or amount of houses and condos for sale in the District, continues to plague D.C.’s housing market and it’s not getting any better.

Long & Foster now reports there is just a 1.9 month supply of homes for sale in the District.

What exactly does that mean?

“Essentially what it means is that if no other home comes on the market, it will take 1.9 months at the current rate that homes are being absorbed into the market for there to be no homes on the market,” Larry “Boomer” Foster at Long & Foster Real Estate told WTOP.

A six month supply of homes for sale is what it takes to be considered a balanced market.

Tight inventory isn’t necessarily a bad thing, depending on what side of the transaction you’re on.

“It’s a great number if you have a home to sell and a place to go. But when you have that little bit of supply, there is not a lot to choose from when you have the amount of demand that we have in our marketplace right now,” Foster said.

But Foster also says despite low inventory conditions for three years and counting, there is no room for complacency among sellers. Most buyers looking in D.C. are looking for homes that are move-in ready. A house that isn’t correctly priced or needs a lot of updates may still be difficult to sell, he said.

A home in D.C. that hit the market in July went under contract in an average of 24 days, with many listings getting multiple offers and selling much faster.

Sellers in D.C. got, on average, 99.9 percent of their asking price. The median price of what sold in the District in July was $568,000.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story