Skip to main content

DC area gets C+ for small business friendliness (but is that fair?)

WASHINGTON — The D.C. area’s score for small-business friendliness took a hit this year, according to an annual survey by Thumbtack, a website and app that connects consumers to small business contractors.

The D.C. area scored a C-plus in this year’s survey of Thumbtack members, down from an overall friendliness grade of A-minus in 2017.

D.C. scores took the biggest hits this year in business regulations, licensing and tax codes.

The area also went from an A-minus for government websites in last year’s survey to an F this year. That score is not based on the quality or user-friendliness of government websites. Thumbtack members were simply asked if they’d used a government website to comply with a regulation or learn about operating a business.

Local governments consistently get good ratings for their taxpayer-facing websites. The Center for Digital Government and the National Association of Counties’ most recent Digital Counties survey gave top marks to Montgomery County and Arlington County. Fairfax County and Prince George’s County also earned among the highest marks in the nation.

The D.C. area’s C-plus grade ranks it 32nd out of the 57 metro areas Thumbtack’s survey covered.

Despite the tight labor market, the D.C. area earned an A-plus for ease of hiring and an A-minus for employment and labor. The area also got a B-plus for ease of starting a business, contrary to a low score for regulations.

The survey also ranked states for small business friendliness. Virginia earned an overall grade of B. Maryland earned an overall business friendliness grade of B-plus.

Thumbtack surveyed over 7,500 small business owners for this year’s results, covering a diverse swath of occupations, from electrocutions and music teachers to wedding planners, wellness professionals and more.

Thumbtack’s entire small business owner survey results for metro areas and states, and its methodology is posted online.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story