Skip to main content

Obama’s Lost Opportunity on Child Soldiers

This week, the Obama administration issued the final waivers under the Child Soldier Prevention Act. The waivers will allow seven governments to continue to receive U.S. military assistance and weapons despite evidence of their recruitment and use of child soldiers. While this annual bureaucratic stroke of a pen flies under the radar, these waiver determinations mark a significant moment for the administration’s legacy on protecting children in conflict and promoting strong human rights standards.

The Child Soldiers Prevention Act (CSPA) is intended to leverage coveted U.S. military assistance and encourage governments to stop using children in combat. Signed into law in 2008, the CSPA took effect in 2010 and restricts U.S. military support to countries identified by the State Department as having recruited and used child soldiers in their national militaries or government-supported armed groups. If a country appears on the annual CSPA list, it may be ineligible to receive U.S. weapons and military assistance in the following fiscal year.

The president may, however, waive these prohibitions (in part or in full) in the name of U.S. “national interest” and allow offending countries to continue to receive arms and assistance despite their recruitment and/or use of child soldiers. For the last six years, the Obama administration has justified the use of “national interest” waivers to support broader security concerns including counterterrorism and efforts to fight non-state armed groups.

This year, 10 countries are identified on the CSPA list: Burma, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Iraq, Nigeria, Rwanda, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The Obama administration granted full waivers to Burma, Iraq and Nigeria, partial waivers to the DRC, Somalia, South Sudan and Rwanda and did not waive the prohibitions on Sudan, Syria and Yemen — three countries that are not slated to receive any U.S. military assistance or arms sales.

In effect, these waivers will allow at least $273 million in military assistance to flow to countries known to be using child soldiers. This has been a consistent pattern of behavior for the Obama administration. Over the past six years, the administration has provided more than $1.2 billion in military assistance and arms sales to the 13 countries identified for recruiting and using child soldiers.

[UNICEF: Nearly 50 Million Children ‘Uprooted’ Worldwide]

Many of the countries identified by the State Department this year have appeared on the CSPA list since its inception, with five reappearing on the list every year since 2010. Nearly all of these countries have received either full or partial waivers at some point in time. Indeed, this year, the president waived only the assistance it was planning to provide and prohibited assistance that was never slated to be delivered. Over the past six years, the administration has withheld just over $56 million in military assistance and $5 million in arms sales to violating countries, or less than five percent of funds that would have been restricted had it not used waivers. It is not difficult to prohibit assistance that was never going to provided.

This last round of waiver determinations has cemented Obama’s legacy on preventing the use of child soldiers worldwide. Although there have been some positive changes under the CSPA — some countries such as Chad have been removed from the CSPA list when they have eliminated the use of child soldiers — overall the Obama administration has been loathe to leverage the full weight of the CSPA. Rather than using the CSPA as a carrot to encourage governments to stop recruiting and using child soldiers, the United States has largely given a free pass to some of the world’s worst violators.

Indeed, in the midst of the brutality of the conflict in South Sudan, where forces on all sides of the conflict continue to use children to wage war, the United States has waived Juba’s sanctions in part based on the justification that South Sudanese forces will continue to take part in the hunt for soldiers in the Lord’s Resistance Army — a group infamous for its systematic kidnapping and use of child soldiers. The irony of supporting one government that is using child soldiers to hunt down a group that has relied upon child soldiers to wage war for decades seems to be lost on the Obama administration, which has waived CSPA prohibitions every year for South Sudan and permitted the country to receive $120 million in U.S. military assistance and more than $20 million in U.S. arms sales.

During the course of its term, the Obama administration has missed a vital opportunity to ensure that the CSPA carries more weight than the paper it’s written on. The administration’s habitual use of full or partial national interest waivers has, in effect, voided much of the act’s potential impact to help improve the lives of children around the world. Instead of incentivizing countries to demobilize child soldiers and prevent further recruitment into military and/or paramilitary groups, the administration repeatedly sent a message to violating countries that they could continue to use child soldiers with little to no consequence.

The United States has a powerful tool to stop the internationally condemned practice of child soldiers, but due to political considerations — notably the importance given to providing assistance to help support counterterrorism efforts — the CSPA has fallen short of its potential.

The United States has an opportunity to be a leader in efforts to limit and ultimately prevent the use of child soldiers. Although the CSPA is not a panacea to stop the horrific practice of child soldiers, it is a tool that should be used by the next administration to promote change in government behavior and protect the most vulnerable. Children around the world deserve better.

More from U.S. News

With the Help of Disabled U.S. Veterans, the U.S. Paralympics Team Gets a Boost

When Women Wear Blue Helmets

The Young Face of the Refugee Crisis

Obama’s Lost Opportunity on Child Soldiers originally appeared on usnews.com

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story