Skip to main content

Donald Trump Takes Hillary Clinton’s Bait In First Presidential Debate

HEMPSTEAD, N.Y. — Hillary Clinton managed to crawl under Donald Trump’s skin in the first presidential debate Monday night by targeting his most sensitive pressure points: his wealth and his business record.

The Democratic nominee systematically needled Trump on the primary qualification he’s put forward to voters, often parrying thorny questions into detailed diatribes on his checkered professional past that’s made him a renowned international figure. Trump, who responded to Clinton’s charges with aggravation, indignation and consistent interruptions, sought to paint the former secretary of state as a stale politician who has failed to produce results at home and abroad after decades toiling in public life.

But while Clinton largely took Trump’s erratic broadsides in stride, refusing to be rattled and producing the night’s most memorable and cutting lines, Trump seemed more concerned about responding to Clinton’s strikes and defending his gold-plated brand than connecting with the American public about their issues and concerns.

Clinton looked comfortable and smiled throughout the 90-minute face-off at Hofstra University, even during some of the most tension-ridden exchanges. Trump wore a steely scowl on his face from the beginning, often anxiously bobbing his head into the microphone to interject and curiously sniffling throughout.

It amounted to a missed opportunity for Trump that could inhibit his ability to make a full comeback in the tightening race for the White House with just over 40 days until the election. One focus group of 29 undecided voters in Ohio found that 17 scored the debate for Clinton. Not one said Trump was the victor.

Clinton signaled early on that she would attempt to prick Trump by citing that he was fortunate to get his start in business with a $14 million loan from his father. When moderator Lester Holt of NBC News turned to Trump with a question about how he would resurrect American manufacturing, the Republican nominee couldn’t resist defending his business beginnings, saying his father gave him only a small loan in 1975, which he used to create a multibillion dollar company.

It was an early sign that Trump would not allow any slight about his past to go unanswered. Over the span of the debate, that worked to Clinton’s benefit.

But it wasn’t all smooth sailing for her.

An early and spirited back-and-forth on trade played to Trump’s strength. While he took the populist offensive and called for the broad renegotiation of U.S. trade deals, Clinton was placed on the defensive for her husband’s signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement and her change of position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which she now says she opposes.

“Your husband signed NAFTA, which was one of the worst things that’s ever happened to the manufacturing industry,” Trump said.

When Trump persisted on Clinton’s inconsistency on the issue, she almost appeared at a loss for words, though she insisted her TPP opposition came once the deal’s final terms were laid out.

“Well, Donald, I know you live in your own reality,” she said.

But after Clinton told the audience she had turned her website into a template to fact-check Trump’s statements, he redirected the argument toward terrorism, claiming she was unwisely telegraphing her plan for fighting the Islamic State group.

“No wonder you’ve been fighting ISIS your entire adult life,” he said, oddly.

Clinton smiled.

“Join the debate by saying more crazy things,” she later said.

Pressed on when he would release his tax returns — a practice followed by every modern major party nominee — Trump again deflected to say he would do so when a government audit was completed.

Clinton suggested Trump was stalling on disclosing his taxes for multiple reasons, another attack meant to make his blood boil. She said he may not be as wealthy or charitable as he claims, that he owes millions to Wall Street and foreign banks and that his returns may just reveal he is skirting paying federal taxes altogether.

“It must be something really important, even terrible, that he’s trying to hide,” she goaded.

At first, Trump challenged Clinton, saying he would make his taxes public when she releases “her 33,000 emails that have been deleted.”

It was a smart play for Trump to raise an issue that goes to the heart of voters’ concerns about her trustworthiness, but he failed to drive it home.

While Clinton briefly but directly acknowledged her decision to conduct government business via private email was a mistake, Trump lingered on that vulnerability only briefly, missing an obvious opportunity to hammer at his opponent’s most glaring weakness.

Whether it was a lack of discipline or an inability to recall the facts on the spot, Trump whiffed on what should’ve been a scorching blow against Clinton. Instead, she walked away from the exchange — as she did from the evening — mostly unscathed.

And while Trump has tried to move past his embrace of the birther issue — the conspiracy theory that President Barack Obama was not born in the U.S. — Clinton looked to make it part of a long pattern of behavior that hearkened back to his early real estate dealings, when he was sued by the Justice Department and accused of not renting to African-Americans in New York City.

Trump’s only response was to say that other companies were sued as well and to boast that he settled the lawsuit without an admission of guilt. But, he quipped, “I notice you bring that up a lot.”

And on the country’s housing crisis, when Clinton said Trump once rooted for it in order to make money, the billionaire was unapologetic and unsympathetic.

“That’s called business, by the way,” he retorted.

Clinton’s preparation for the high-stakes platform was on full display. While her opening statement sounded dispassionate and scripted, she appeared to grow into her own voice as the debate progressed, even when employing canned lines.

She dubbed her opponent’s tax-cutting plan “Trumped-up trickle-down.”

She produced a swift and stinging comeback when Trump came at her for taking time off the campaign trail.

“Donald just criticized me for preparing for this debate. And, yes, I did. And you know what else I prepared for? I prepared to be president,” she said.

And when Trump went on a lengthy tangent criticizing her foreign policy record, she visibly shook at her podium in a playful manner and let out a “Whoo!” while wearing a big, broad smile.

Aside from his early pronouncements on trade, Trump relied mostly on emotion and highlights of the opposition research book prepared for him. He skirted substance and often returned to his signature phrases.

He accused Clinton of planning to raise taxes “big league.” In highlighting a potential stop-and-frisk policy to curb violence, he accused Clinton of not wanting to use the words “law and order” to form her approach.

He vehemently denied he was ever in favor of the Iraq War, even though Holt noted “the record shows otherwise.”

And he plainly took a shot at Clinton’s health, saying he doesn’t believe she has the stamina to be president.

Even in this highly formal setting, Trump essentially hued to his true form — antagonistic, caustic and unapologetic — and it likely didn’t advance his case.

But there was one line Trump did draw — sort of.

After Clinton rattled off past statements Trump has made about women, saying he’s called them “pigs,” “slobs” and “dogs,” he strongly suggested he had considered raising former President Bill Clinton’s infidelity against her in the debate.

Over the weekend, after all, he had floated bringing Gennifer Flowers, a woman whom Bill Clinton had a sexual relationship with years ago, to sit in the front row at Hofstra.

In both cases, Trump evidently concluded, “I just can’t do it.”

Yet in a way, he still did.

More from U.S. News

Donald Trump Hillary Clinton Presidential Debate September 26 2016

Clinton Clears High Hurdle in Repelling Trump

Jill Stein Escorted From Hofstra Campus Trying to Crash Debate

Donald Trump Takes Hillary Clinton’s Bait In First Presidential Debate originally appeared on usnews.com

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story