Skip to main content

Obama and Boehner Are Right to Call for Criminal Justice Reform

Speaking Thursday in Philadelphia, President Barack Obama tried to impress on the NAACP, the nation’s oldest civil rights organization, the importance of addressing the problem that “in too many places, black boys and black men, Latino boys and Latino men experience being treated differently under the law.”

Not everyone will agree with his analysis. The role of race in the criminal justice process is a subject that has long been disputed. There are probably just as many studies indicating it plays no role as there are saying it is a determining factor. What is undeniable is that, in a nation that holds liberty to be a founding concept, too many people are in prison for too long.

[SEE: Editorial Cartoons on Obama]

This is as true for many so-called white collar criminals and those who have, for example, caught too many fish at the wrong time of the year or made mistakes when filling out government-mandated paperwork as it is for many who are incarcerated because they made bad decisions involving illegal drugs.

One who shares this sentiment, apparently, is House Speaker John Boehner. On Thursday, the Ohio Republican endorsed the idea of bringing legislation to the floor that would enact a number of reforms to the criminal justice system.

It is not often that Obama and Boehner are on the same page. In this case they are — and for the good of the country.

The bill Boehner wants on the floor, the bi-partisan SAFE Act, introduced by Reps. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., and Bobby Scott, D-Va., is an imperfect but fairly comprehensive measure that would address some of the inequities of prison life. One major provision would reserve life sentences for drug trafficking and other major penalties only for those involved at high levels in the organized sale and distribution of illegal narcotics. At the same time, judges would be given more flexibility in the way they deal with low-level offenders and would establish new, special courts just for drug crimes and for the mentally ill.

[SEE: Editorial Cartoons on Congress]

This is an excellent place to start, but let it be the beginning of a national conversation rather than an end, after which everyone pats themselves on the back for a job well done and moves on to other issues.

To put it plainly, the U.S. criminal justice system must be reviewed from top to bottom. There is a more than convincing case to be made that prosecutors, especially at the federal level, not only have too much power but that there are few if any effective checks on it.

Chief Justice John Marshall once observed “the power to tax involves the power to destroy.” So too is the power to indict; a criminal charge is often enough to ruin a person’s life even if they may be later found to be innocent. That a person may also be bankrupted in the process of defending him or herself against a federal charge is something that clearly figures into the strategy of those bringing indictments as former assistant U.S. Attorney Sidney Powell, Professor Harvey Silverglate and other have shown in the books they have written on the subject.

As the system is currently configured, the primary focus is on winning convictions. That opens the door to promotions, public attention and lucrative jobs in the private sector. Is it not on the pursuit of justice which, according to the canon of legal ethics, not only should be but is the most important consideration for any prosecutor bringing an indictment or trying a case.

[READ: Punishment Begets Punishment]

Former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik put it well when he said Monday that any reform effort must go beyond simple sentencing reform. On his list: prosecutorial misconduct, federal Bureau of Prisons oversight, prison population reduction, and the development of prison rehabilitation programs that prepare inmates for life beyond prison walls, instead of serving as a way to pass time on the inside.

“In the spirit of second chances, we must adopt legislation that ensures full rights restoration for nonviolent offenders once they have paid their debt to society. As it stands, second chances are meaningless if non-violent offenders continue being deprived of their civil and constitutional rights for the remainder of their lives,” Kerik said in a statement, and he ought to know. Not only was he was the top cop in the nation’s largest city; he’s also a convicted felon who now heads up the American Coalition of Criminal Justice Reform.

The stars are aligned. Obama and Boehner are of one mind on the need to act. There are 2.2 million people currently in American prisons, some of whom do not need to be there. There is no reason not to go forward.

More from U.S. News

Editorial Cartoons on Barack Obama

Political Cartoons on Congress

Punishment Begets Punishment

Obama and Boehner Are Right to Call for Criminal Justice Reform originally appeared on usnews.com

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story