Skip to main content

Could more have been done for Thomas Eric Duncan?

EMILY SCHMALL
Associated Press

DALLAS (AP) — When Thomas Eric Duncan became the first diagnosed case of Ebola in the United States, his relatives with roots in virus-ravaged Liberia knew what questions to ask.

Would his treatment include experimental drugs? Was a blood transfusion from a survivor an option? What about a transfer from the hospital in Dallas, where he was being treated, to one of four medical centers nationwide that specialize in highly infectious diseases like Ebola?

Duncan, poor and uninsured, did not get all the help his family members wanted, and they now question why his care was different in some ways than that of Americans infected with the deadly virus who survived. Of the nine people who have been treated for Ebola in the U.S., only Duncan has died.

“We asked. We begged. We pleaded. I even offered my own blood, even though it wouldn’t do anything for him,” said nephew Josephus Weeks, who was so close in age to Duncan that they were raised like brothers. “We requested everything we could think of to save Eric. They said no.”

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas spokesman Wendell Watson said “many treatment options” were considered, including experimental drugs and a transfusion. What could be done to save Duncan was “discussed daily” with experts at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Emory University in Atlanta, which has a special isolation unit that successfully treated other Ebola patients. He said all parties decided to leave Duncan in Dallas, where he died Oct. 8.

___

Duncan’s medical records, which the family shared with The Associated Press, note the smallest details of his treatment: what he ate, how he looked, the fluids and drugs pumped into his Ebola-ridden body.

The records probably reflect a fraction of the discussions over Duncan’s care. Still, they say relatively little about experimental treatment. Five days passed from the time a doctor first suspected Ebola, when Duncan returned a second time to the ER on Sept. 28, until hospital officials noted they were trying to secure an experimental drug, brincidofovir, for Duncan on Oct. 3.

Worried about the delay, Weeks texted his hospital contact on Oct. 4.

“Is there an experimental treatment we need to speak about?” Weeks said in a text message exchange with a Presbyterian Hospital liaison, Jennifer Rainer.

“He has gotten a first dose,” Rainer replied minutes later, adding that she could not say whether the drug was working.

Duncan received another dose of brincidofovir on Oct. 7 — the day before he died, records show.

Experts disagree on whether getting Duncan an experimental drug sooner, giving him a different drug or a blood transfusion would have made a difference.

“No real way to know, since there are absolutely no data on it,” said Dr. Greg Moran, an emergency and infectious disease specialist at UCLA.

But Dr. Thomas Geisbert, an Ebola expert at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, said he had trouble understanding why four days elapsed between Duncan’s confirmed test results on Sept. 30 and his first treatment. And he was surprised by the choice of experimental drug given to Duncan.

“The guys who do what I do, working in this field, find it puzzling,” said Geisbert, a professor of microbiology and immunology who has been studying Ebola since the early 1990s and was consulted on two of the U.S. cases. “It kind of came out of left field. I think the jury is still out on why this would have any activity against Ebola.”

Although treatments have varied, ZMapp and TKM-Ebola are the only drugs proven to protect nonhuman primates from Ebola, Geisbert said.

While the manufacturer of ZMapp ran out of the drug before Duncan’s diagnosis, limited doses of TKM-Ebola were available, according to Julie Rezler, a spokeswoman for the drugmaker, Tekmira.

The latter was given to Dr. Rick Sacra, an American physician who was infected with Ebola in Liberia. He was treated at a Nebraska hospital and released healthy on Sept. 25, five days before blood tests confirmed Duncan’s diagnosis.

Other survivors include American medical missionaries Dr. Kent Brantly and Nancy Writebol, who received doses of ZMapp in Liberia before they were flown to the United States.

Watson, the Presbyterian Hospital spokesman, said “one of the investigational medicines was felt to be too risky, one — ZMapp — we were told was not available.”

“Permissions had to be obtained from the FDA, Institutional Review Board and others, and then the drug had to be located and obtained,” Watson said. “That process moved as quickly as it could be done.”

Brantly said he also offered his plasma to Duncan but that the two men’s blood types did not match. The Dallas hospital said it could not find a matching blood type among Ebola survivors for a transfusion with Duncan, who was Type B-positive.

With limited research and experience, it’s difficult for experts to know what treatments make a critical difference for Ebola patients. For example, doses of ZMapp were given to a Spanish priest and a Liberian doctor, who both died. Brincidofovir, which Duncan received, was also given to Ebola-stricken American video journalist Ashoka Mukpo, who survived.

“It’s virtually impossible to say that this is the thing that that did it, and this is the thing that didn’t do it,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said Friday as he announced that one of Duncan’s nurses who became infected, Nina Pham, had received blood plasma from another survivor. “At this point, everything is experimental.”

___

Duncan’s relatives say they also sought to have him sent to Emory University, one of the specialized hospitals. Duncan’s medical records suggest he was still strong enough several days into his hospitalization to walk around his room, sip Sprite and watch an action movie. There is no discussion of a move in Duncan’s medical records.

It’s not clear who made the decision to keep Duncan at the Dallas hospital.

Christine Mann, spokeswoman for the Texas Department of State Health Services, said the decision not to move Duncan came from Presbyterian Hospital and the CDC.

“At the time it was the CDC’s guidance that most hospitals in the country could manage an Ebola patient,” Mann said in an email. “The hospital was willing to treat the patient and it was their decision to keep treating him.”

CDC spokesman Thomas Skinner said the decision to keep Duncan in Dallas was made by the hospital, doctors and the patient. CDC officials said they sent two epidemiologists to Dallas to trace Duncan’s contacts for signs of further infection, not to consult on treatment.

Hospital officials discussed moving Duncan with the CDC and Emory, said Watson, the hospital spokesman. Watson said the CDC felt a transfer was unnecessary.

Less than a week after Duncan’s death, CDC Director Tom Frieden said he wished he had dispatched a bigger team to Dallas.

Not all Ebola patients have been treated at one of the four specialized hospitals. While Pham and the other Duncan nurse infected with Ebola, Amber Vinson, were flown almost immediately to specialized facilities, Bellevue Hospital Center in New York City is now treating Dr. Craig Spencer, who apparently contracted Ebola treating patients in West Africa.

Duncan’s family in North Carolina and his fiancee in Dallas have suggested that his care was influenced by his race and class.

Weeks said he found it “conspicuous” that Duncan, the only U.S. patient to die, was black.

Watson, the hospital spokesman, said race and class were not a factor in Duncan’s care. He said the facility treats every patient with compassion and strives to provide safe, quality care to everyone.

Duncan’s sister, Mai Wureh, said her brother “felt rejected.” She feels frustrated. Although the hospital promised to supply Duncan’s lab results, they are still waiting nearly three weeks later.

“I didn’t get to speak to anyone in authority,” said Wureh, a registered nurse. “I don’t know who to blame.”

___

AP national writer Martha Mendoza in Dallas and Mitch Weiss in Kannapolis, N.C., contributed to this report.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story