Skip to main content

Referee Nichimura’s decisions in spotlight

GRAHAM DUNBAR
AP Sports Writer

SAO PAULO (AP) — Just one game into the World Cup, and referees are already in the spotlight.

The refereeing standards at the World Cup are always hotly debated, and Yuishi Nichimura made sure this one won’t be any different after a controversial performance in the opening match on Thursday.

For Croatia coach Niko Kovac, the Japanese official was out of his depth on such a big stage, and risked making “a circus” of the World Cup.

“I usually never attack referees, but this time I can only say: shameful,” Kovac said after his team’s 3-1 loss to a Brazil swung on a questionable second-half penalty. “This is a robbery.”

Nichimura pointed to the spot when Brazil’s powerful forward Fred fell to ground from a slight touch on his upper left arm by Dejan Lovren.

Neymar converted the 71st-minute penalty, giving the host nation a 2-1 lead after trailing early in the match.

Some referees may not even have allowed Neymar to stick around for that long.

Nichimura showed the Brazil star just a yellow card in the 26th for pushing a forearm into the throat of Croatia playmaker Luka Modric.

That incident sparked the first agitated clamor around the referee, and more followed as Croatian frustration grew late in the game and after the final whistle. The message seemed to be lost.

“I never saw in my life that a referee don’t speak English,” said defender Vedran Corluka, though it is required of World Cup referees. “He was speaking something in Japanese but no one could understand him.”

So the World Cup has its usual refereeing furor earlier than usual.

Though Nichimura is a full-time referee at his second World Cup, his display revived complaints from Europe about varying standards.

Any matchup between a South American and European team is tricky for FIFA because it requires a neutral referee from a continent where fewer high-intensity matches are played. Throw in the fact that the host nation was playing in a stadium packed with noisy, fervent fans, and the situation gets even tougher.

“Unfortunately, the referee was completely out of his depth,” Kovac said through a translator. “If we continue in this vein there will be 100 penalties in the World Cup.”

FIFA’s director of refereeing, Massimo Busacca, was aware of the challenge facing his match official teams long before the tournament started.

Asked last week about players expertly bending the rules, Busacca acknowledged it was tough to spot “a foul from a simulation as it is mostly a question of centimeters.”

“It is important that the referees show their personality in order to prevent bad behavior,” the Swiss former referee said.

Busacca and Nichimura were colleagues at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa, where controversy came early and often.

Brazil’s group-stage win over with Ivory Coast saw Luis Fabiano score after twice handling the ball in the build-up, and a potential late winning goal for the United States against Slovenia was disallowed and never fully explained.

Most famously, Frank Lampard’s shot which crossed the line but was not given for England in a second-round loss against Germany saw the laws of football changed. Goal-line technology made its World Cup debut Thursday in Sao Paulo.

Nichimura worked four matches at the 2010 World Cup but is best known, ironically, for sending off Brazil defender Felipe Melo in its quarterfinal exit against the Netherlands.

Then, FIFA rewarded Nichimura by naming him fourth official to England’s Howard Webb in the testy final between Spain and the Dutch.

While FIFA never publicly criticizes its referees, Fred’s successful flop means Nichimura is unlikely to stick around for the final this time.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story