Skip to main content

Court rules against Wells Fargo

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court said Tuesday that Wells Fargo cannot avoid new allegations of misconduct stemming from the mortgage crisis even though the bank has already paid $5 billion in a national settlement between the government and financial institutions.

Six months after the 2012 settlement, the government filed a wide-ranging complaint against Wells Fargo in federal court in New York alleging further wrongdoing, this time focused on the bank’s origination and underwriting of thousands of individual, federally insured mortgages. Wells Fargo went to court, saying its prior settlement broadly released the bank from liability for any company-wide conduct having to do with annual certifications to the government.

In a 3-0 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit says the settlement was much narrower, and it expressly preserved the government’s right to pursue claims regarding federal insurance of residential mortgage loans that violates any applicable laws or regulations.

“Wells Fargo’s efforts to escape those contractual limitations fail,” wrote the three-judge panel.

The three judges in the case were Janice Rogers Brown and Thomas Griffith, both nominees of President George W. Bush, and Patricia Millett, a nominee of President Barack Obama

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Emergency guide: What you should do to prepare for emergencies

WASHINGTON — Do you know what you'd do if an emergency hits? What if you're at work, your spouse is stuck in traffic and your children are in school? There's no way to plan for every emergency, but you can make sure you're prepared for different scenarios, including making a plan for your family and building a kit of emergency supplies.
Read Next Story